[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev 2-8-1 bug: print vs partial
From: |
Philip Webb |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev 2-8-1 bug: print vs partial |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Dec 1998 07:34:29 -0500 (EST) |
981203 KW & TD commented on the print/e-mail bug:
>> it's something to do with a `sigbus', which is beyond me.
> Yes, if it is memory corruption (in this case, freeing memory
> that another part of the program may still access later),
> then it is unpredictable where a problem will occur (if at all).
> SIGSEGV or SIGBUS may be generated in a place that looks totally unrelated.
-- snip --
that matches the result i described in `Further (2)'.
it is weird that the problem arises
only when p is invoked PART-WAY INTO the document (not at the top):
does that suggest anything?
i'm due to fall asleep soon & will try patches & further research thereafter.
BTW for my continuing education:
what is a segmentation error (SIGSEGV) & why is it so named?
--
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : address@hidden
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto
- lynx-dev 2-8-1 bug: print vs partial, Philip Webb, 1998/12/01
- Re: lynx-dev 2-8-1 bug: print vs partial, Leonid Pauzner, 1998/12/03
- lynx-dev memory leaks vs corruption, Philip Webb, 1998/12/03
- Re: lynx-dev memory leaks vs corruption, Larry W. Virden, 1998/12/03
- Re: lynx-dev memory leaks vs corruption, pg, 1998/12/04
- Re: lynx-dev memory leaks vs corruption, Larry W. Virden, 1998/12/04
- Re: lynx-dev memory leaks vs corruption, Philip Webb, 1998/12/04
- Re: lynx-dev memory leaks vs corruption, mattack, 1998/12/04
- Re: lynx-dev memory leaks vs corruption, Larry W. Virden, 1998/12/04
- Re: lynx-dev memory leaks vs corruption, David Woolley, 1998/12/07