[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev RE: "remove the r command"
From: |
David Combs |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev RE: "remove the r command" |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Dec 1998 23:18:28 -0800 (PST) |
> From address@hidden Thu Dec 10 15:48:05 1998
> X-Authentication-Warning: Stratus.CAM.ORG: ismael owned process doing -bs
> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 18:43:54 -0500 (EST)
> From: Ismael Cordeiro <address@hidden>
...
>
> > i have never understood why the r command hasn't been removed,
> > but of course it takes a volunteer to do the necessary work.
>
> And I can't understand why you want to remove the "remove" command just
> because sometimes it doesn't work with incorrectly edited bookmarks files!
> The "remove" command is very practical and has been correctly working for
> more than two years here. If there really is a problem it should be
> corrected, not the command removed.
>
> Ismael
One kludgey "solution" would be, on the r command, to ASK the
user:
Answer y if you really want to delete THIS bookmark (and
note, it MIGHT not be the one you are EXPECTING!):
<the bookmark>
y or n?
Advantages: (1) trivial to implement (2) foolproof.
David
(no, don't ask me to implement it; I haven't used C for
years, and even then never wrote anything more than 100 lines
long. Have been using "Mainsail" since 1982 -- and ratfor
before that, Fortran before even that. Though am playing
with perl now -- given all the kludges in syntax and semantics,
is pretty neat language, and QUITE useful.)
- Re: lynx-dev RE: "remove the r command",
David Combs <=