Re: lynx-dev results on lint on lynx 2.8.2dev9

[dickey]

>  
> Here are the warnings from Solaris lint that I thought might want to be 

thanks - I've looked briefly at lint on Solaris, but iirc, it usually
(lint) breaks.

> examined by people responsible for various modules.  I know they are only 
> warnings.  In the case of the fallthrough messages, I only left in the 
> warnings that had no comments around them indicating that the fallthrough 
> was intentional.  Perhaps someone should take a look to ensure that each 
> of these are intentional fallthroughs.  If you let me know, I would be 
> happy to create patches of fallthrough comments in the appropriate places . 
> In the case of non-unique names, this would only be a problem on an IBM MVS 
> environment  which required 8 character uniqueness. 

There is some logic to support shortnames - though I have noticed numerous
places (and fixed) where the #define's go the wrong way.

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey