[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Problem with ^Z suspending - so far...
From: |
Kari E. Hurtta |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Problem with ^Z suspending - so far... |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jan 1999 15:31:25 +0200 (EET) |
Bela Lubkin:
> A stronger solution is for the job-control-aware program to establish
> itself as a separate pgrp, and make that the foreground group. Then it
> will receive signals, but anything else in the session won't. Then, in
> its stop-signal handler, it would need to cede control back to the
> parent (by changing the foreground pgrp, then sending it an appropriate
> sort of stop signal). This is complex -- have to deal with situations
> where there is no parent (exec'd from a child of init), where the parent
> subsequently dies; also have to deal sensibly with children, both non-
> interactive (NSL_FORK child, gzcat, etc.) and interactive ('!' = SHELL).
>
> Complex, but doable. Shells do it. You can run ash from bash from csh,
> run programs underneath that, job control them, and get sane results
> (usually).
Yes. That was it what I mentioned that I have done once [1].
/ Kari Hurtta
[1]
Oftp.funet.fi: /pub/unix/tools/kehpager-* I think.
- lynx-dev Problem with ^Z suspending - so far..., Klaus Weide, 1999/01/27
- Re: lynx-dev Problem with ^Z suspending - so far..., Bela Lubkin, 1999/01/27
- Re: lynx-dev Problem with ^Z suspending - so far..., Henry Nelson, 1999/01/27
- Re: lynx-dev Problem with ^Z suspending - so far..., Klaus Weide, 1999/01/28
- lynx-dev more on Forms., Mark E. Crane, 1999/01/28
- Re: lynx-dev more on Forms., Philip Webb, 1999/01/28
- Re: lynx-dev more on Forms., Mark E. Crane, 1999/01/28
- Re: lynx-dev more on Forms., Philip Webb, 1999/01/28
- Re: lynx-dev more on Forms., pg, 1999/01/29
- Re: lynx-dev more on Forms., Philip Webb, 1999/01/29
Re: lynx-dev Problem with ^Z suspending - so far..., dickey, 1999/01/27