Re: lynx-dev LYNX: P(rint) removes "underlines"

[Philip Webb]

990129 Thomas Dickey wrote: 
> 990129 David Combs quoted a document:
>> Note that you'll see lots of the text "underlined" & in THIS article
>> one needs to know what has been underlined to read it correctly
>> P(rint) it out to a file -- where'd they go? 
> 'print' doesn't do underlines
> since it (like the dump option) just saves the text as is.

i can see this may be the best default to be system-compatible,
but wouldn't it be useful to have an option in  lynx.cfg
to retain emphases marked in some fashion,
so that the document could be run thro' a script
to output a file matching the user's editor/mailer, with emphases?

-- 
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT     ___________//___,  Philip Webb : address@hidden
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|  Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT    `-O----------O---'  University of Toronto