[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Redundant link movement cmds? (was: Some thought on
From: |
Philip Webb |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Redundant link movement cmds? (was: Some thought on |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Jan 1999 18:49:56 -0500 (EST) |
990130 Larry Virden wrote:
> having keys to move per line is great,
> just like having one key to move from one page of text to the next
> as well as a key to move from one link to the next
> (regardless of how much text is skipped in that move) is nice.
so please tell me which the last is supposed to be:
i have no key which takes me to the next link,
if that link is > 1 page below where i am:
NEXT_LINK should logically do that, but for me at least it doesn't.
--
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : address@hidden
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto
- lynx-dev Some thought on additional TEXTAREA functions, Kim DeVaughn, 1999/01/29
- lynx-dev Redundant link movement cmds? (was: Some thought on additional TEXTAREA functions), Kim DeVaughn, 1999/01/30
- Re: lynx-dev Redundant link movement cmds? (was: Some thought on additional TEXTAREA functions), Leonid Pauzner, 1999/01/30
- lynx-dev Re: Redundant link movement cmds? (was: Some thought on additional TEXTAREA functions), Kim DeVaughn, 1999/01/30
- Re: lynx-dev Redundant link movement cmds? (was: Some thought on, Larry W. Virden, 1999/01/30
- Re: lynx-dev Redundant link movement cmds? (was: Some thought on,
Philip Webb <=
- Re: lynx-dev Redundant link movement cmds? (was: Some thought on, Larry W. Virden, 1999/01/30
- Re: lynx-dev Redundant link movement cmds?, Philip Webb, 1999/01/30
- Re: lynx-dev Redundant link movement cmds?, Larry W. Virden, 1999/01/30
- Re: lynx-dev Redundant link movement cmds?, Klaus Weide, 1999/01/30
- Re: lynx-dev Redundant link movement cmds?, Philip Webb, 1999/01/30
Re: lynx-dev Redundant link movement cmds? (was: Some thought on additional TEXTAREA functions), mattack, 1999/01/30