[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Re: AIX Y2K upgrade problem
From: |
Clair Wilson |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Re: AIX Y2K upgrade problem |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Feb 1999 11:45:18 -0500 (EST) |
Klaus
Try this. This is a copy-paste of the full screen output from the -trace :
HTParse: aName:http://lynx.browser.org/ relatedName:
HTParse: result:
Entered HTAnchor_findAddress
New anchor 200e1c58 has hash 57 and address `http://lynx.browser.org/'
HTAccess: loading document http://lynx.browser.org/
HTParse: aName:http://lynx.browser.org/ relatedName:file:
HTParse: result:http
HTParse: aName:http://lynx.browser.org/ relatedName:
HTParse: result:lynx.browser.org
HTParse: aName:http://lynx.browser.org/ relatedName:
HTParse: result:http
HTParse: aName:http://lynx.browser.org/ relatedName:
HTParse: result:lynx.browser.org
Looking up lynx.browser.org.
HTParseInet: Parsed address as port 80, IP address 195.40.122.44
Making HTTP connection to lynx.browser.org.
HTTP: Unable to connect to remote host for `http://lynx.browser.org/'
(errno = 9
Alert!: Unable to connect to remote host.
HTAccess: status=-29999
HTAccess: `http://lynx.browser.org/' has been accessed, No data loaded..
#
Does this help ? Notice the -29999 status.
Thank You
Mr. Clair Wilson
Internet Administrator
Mainframe System Programmer
Information Services
Robert Packer Hospital
Sayre, Pa.
address@hidden
phone 717-882-5389
fax 717-882-5330
On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Klaus Weide wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Clair Wilson wrote:
> >
> > I found this on the web (for EBADF) :
> >
> > accept
>
> The accept function isn't involved when lynx makes a connection;
> it is just one of many that can result in errno = EBADF.
> But it could be a number of other functions creating the
> problem:
>
> socket
> fcntl or ioctl
> connect
> select
>
> and the EBADF may actually not indicate the original error but
> something that failed as a result of it; maybe a
>
> close.
>
> So we need to know which is the first function call that fails;
> that isn't clear to me from just that message. I hope that a
> full trace would reveal more.
>
> Klaus
>
>
>
>
- lynx-dev Re: AIX Y2K upgrade problem, Clair Wilson, 1999/02/01
- Re: lynx-dev Re: AIX Y2K upgrade problem, Klaus Weide, 1999/02/01
- Re: lynx-dev Re: AIX Y2K upgrade problem, Clair Wilson, 1999/02/02
- Re: lynx-dev Re: AIX Y2K upgrade problem, Klaus Weide, 1999/02/02
- Re: lynx-dev Re: AIX Y2K upgrade problem,
Clair Wilson <=
- lynx-dev "new anchor" message, Clair Wilson, 1999/02/02
- lynx-dev Re: "new anchor" message, Klaus Weide, 1999/02/02
- lynx-dev Re: "new anchor" message, Clair Wilson, 1999/02/02
- Re: lynx-dev Re: "new anchor" message, Philip Webb, 1999/02/02
Re: lynx-dev Re: AIX Y2K upgrade problem, Clair Wilson, 1999/02/02
Re: lynx-dev Re: AIX Y2K upgrade problem, Clair Wilson, 1999/02/02
Re: lynx-dev Re: AIX Y2K upgrade problem, pg, 1999/02/01