[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Re: keeping lynx in sync with gettext
From: |
dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Re: keeping lynx in sync with gettext |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Feb 1999 16:09:48 -0500 (EST) |
>
> On Fri, Feb 05, 1999, address@hidden (address@hidden) said:
> |
> | (sorry - my keyboard bounced on the previous message when I was saving).
>
> Heh. I usually blame the cat ... :-) ...!
just a sticky 'enter' key. the machine I'm using has one...
> | not exactly - I'd like to get rid of tfp as a parameter. Changing the
> | macro syntax would help flush out the change (because the ones that I
> | may miss wouldn't compile).
>
> As long as folks are talking about revising the trace macros, would it
> be possible to add a fflush() after each fprintf() call ...?
it would be easy - if the details were hidden in a function.
(I would have done it as a function, but decided to do it in two stages
to lessen the chance of breaking code - I could compare objects for more
than 90% of the places I changed for the CTRACE macro).
> It is most annoying to be zeroing in on a problem, only to find out that
> the data you need is still in an i/o buffer, because you stupidly forgot
> to explicitly add a CTRACE_FLUSH() yourself.
>
> Shouldn't be a performance issue, since when tracing is on, that's really
> not what one is concerned with.
>
> /kim
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: lynx-dev Re: keeping lynx in sync with gettext,
dickey <=