[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev next/prev link
From: |
Bela Lubkin |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev next/prev link |
Date: |
Sun, 7 Feb 1999 21:19:04 -0800 |
Klaus Weide wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Feb 1999, Larry W. Virden wrote:
>
> > If someone were to spend some time trying to figure out enough about lynx
> > internals to fix the way next/prev link works so that they actually
> > move from link to link instead of from page to page, would applying that
> > code break any important processing anyone is depending upon?
>
> I don't consider the current behavior broken. It is how PREV_LINK and
> NEXT_LINK always worked in lynx, as long as I know. I don't want Down
> Arrow suddenly to start skipping pages - I am used to being able to
> use Down Arrow repeatedly and eventually see all the text.
>
> Whether the functions should be named differently is another question.
>
> You may want a new function with the behavior you prefer. If such a
> modified ALWAYS_NEXT_LINK existed I would probably map it to <tab>
> and leave Down Arrow alone.
Would this skip form fields (which are not, technically, "links")?
What would be most useful to me in this context would be a "go to next
whole form field or link" command. "whole" means that multi-line
structures (like textareas) should only be visited once. If the
document had a structure like:
[page 1]
(*1) link 1
(*2) form field 1
(*3) form field 2
(*4) form field 3, a multiline textarea
form field 3, 2nd line
form field 3, 3rd line
form field 3, 4th line
(*5) form field 4
(*6) link 2
[page 2]
[page 3]
(*7) link 3
-- then hitting this command 6 times would take the cursor sequentially
through each of the (*)'s. <TAB> would be a very good default binding
for this command...
>Bela<