[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Keys, an attempt to understand
From: |
Klaus Weide |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Keys, an attempt to understand |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Feb 1999 07:02:54 -0600 (CST) |
On Thu, 11 Feb 1999, Leonid Pauzner wrote:
> 10-Feb-99 22:41 Klaus Weide wrote:
> >> > 1. 2. 3.
> >> >
> >> > byte sequence ---> lynxkeycode ---> lynxactioncode
> >> > (or ---> lynxeditactioncode)
>
> > I looked at an old lynx2-4-fm.zip - from not long before 2.5, I think -
> > the lynxkeycodes defined now, except for the recent MOUSE_KEY thing,
> > were all already there as today. That means that in several years not
> > one new code was added for a real key.
>
> At least a Visited Links Page ("V") was introduced between 2.6 and 2.7
> I have 2.6 binary (no sources) and see that no keys mapped to uppercase
> letters, all keys were case-insensitive instead.
I meant adding new lynxkeycodes >= 0x100 for new keys, not adding now
lynxactioncode for existing lynxkeycodes - 'V' and all other one-byte
keys 0x00 - 0xff are always there as lynxkeycodes, whether they have
a mapping to an action or not.
Klaus
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Keys, an attempt to understand, (continued)
Re: lynx-dev Keys, - a correction, Klaus Weide, 1999/02/13
Re: lynx-dev Keys, an attempt to understand, Lloyd G. Rasmussen, 1999/02/10
Re: lynx-dev Keys, an attempt to understand, Henry Nelson, 1999/02/10
Re: lynx-dev Keys, an attempt to understand, Henry Nelson, 1999/02/10
Re: lynx-dev Keys, an attempt to understand, dickey, 1999/02/10
Re: lynx-dev Keys, an attempt to understand, Henry Nelson, 1999/02/15
Re: lynx-dev Keys, an attempt to understand, dickey, 1999/02/15