[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev ^Ve considered harmful
From: |
Klaus Weide |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev ^Ve considered harmful |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Feb 1999 10:41:41 -0600 (CST) |
On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, David H wrote:
> >"f" and "t" map to something in DIRED mode. I can imagine at least for "t"
> >some similar "tagging" function for general links outside of DIRED, to
> >mark an URL for some action ("Upload to"?). I don't know about "y", or "w",
> >they seem to be free.
>
> Just thinking out loud here...
> Couldn't the (t)agging effect be handled with checkboxes, thus freeing
> "t" for another function? Or would that cause too much screen clutter in
> DIRED mode?
Why replace a simple straightforward mechanism that doesn't take
much screen real estate and does exists with something much more
complicated that doesn't exist?
> And actually, doesn't DIRED mode go into effect ONLY when viewing a local
> directory? So "f" and "t" could be used for something that doesn't make
> sense when viewing a directory, like editing a Textarea.
Well yes they can - it's just one consideration that I wanted to mention,
that there may be a good reason to reserve "t" for consistency's sake.
Klaus
- Re: lynx-dev ^Ve considered harmful, (continued)
Re: lynx-dev ^Ve considered harmful, Henry Nelson, 1999/02/15
- Re: lynx-dev ^Ve considered harmful, Klaus Weide, 1999/02/16
- lynx-dev keystrokes available, David H, 1999/02/16
- lynx-dev Re: keystrokes available, Kim DeVaughn, 1999/02/16
- lynx-dev Re: keystrokes available, davidh, 1999/02/16
- Re: lynx-dev Re: keystrokes available, Bela Lubkin, 1999/02/16
Re: lynx-dev ^Ve considered harmful, Henry Nelson, 1999/02/15