Re: lynx-dev dev17 clue?

[dickey]

> 
> > checking.  Before I sift through the #ifdef soup (I like that line), 
> > does anyone have issues/arguments against more compiletime options? 
> >  
> > Perhaps it should even default to be disabled -- I expect several 
>  
> ALL recent "features" should be off by default.  Definitely, all 

I guess (since 2.8.1 or since 2.8?)

> so-called "features" should have compiletime options.  When something 
> can't be turned off, it requires delving into the code. 
>  
> Lynx is getting way too big.  Lynx is no longer a valid option on a 
> limited resource machine.  The real problem is that the code only grows. 
> In the last two years, I don't recall the binary being smaller than the 
> previously installed one.  It only gets bigger. 
>  
> __Henry 


-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey