Re: lynx-dev bloating binaries (was clue)

[Larry W. Virden]

From: Henry Nelson <address@hidden>

> > The last time I looked, there were places where static arrays are
> > allocated that could be made dynamic, shrinking the binary a bit, as
> 
> I would hate to start up another thread here, but I don't think dynamic
> linking always means better. In some situations, I believe static

Henry, I am not certain, but I _think_ you misunderstood the comment.

The earlier poster was referring to static vs dynamic as in:

char buff[1024]
vs
char *buff = malloc(1024)

-- 
Larry W. Virden                 <URL: mailto:address@hidden>
<URL: http://www.purl.org/NET/lvirden/> <*> O- "No one is what he seems."
Unless explicitly stated to the contrary, nothing in this posting should 
be construed as representing my employer's opinions.