lynx-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lynx-dev Re: syntax change


From: dickey
Subject: Re: lynx-dev Re: syntax change
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 16:56:10 -0500 (EST)

> Anyway, I agree the 123 and 123g syntax is backward. 
> You would think hte meanings would be reversed. 
> How about the following: treat 123 like 123g for all links 
> except invisible links... 
>  
> > I suppose a configurable option for this is probably too much to ask for 
> > though (sigh). 
>  
> IMO, lynx already has too many configure options, which seem to be 
> added every time a small change is made. 
> Does this require a config option? 

configure script or options-screen?  (if it's reasonably transparent
to existing usage, there's no reason for an options-screen or .lynxrc
or lynx.cfg -- that seems to be what people are discussing).

I'd use configure script mainly to be able to easily factor out bloat
or experimental code.

> --le 


-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]