[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
lynx-dev Re: syntax change - f not g
|
From: |
Kim DeVaughn |
|
Subject: |
lynx-dev Re: syntax change - f not g |
|
Date: |
Tue, 2 Mar 1999 00:45:36 -0800 |
On Tue, Mar 02, 1999, Klaus Weide (address@hidden) said:
|
| I suggest that, if someone wants to do this, you not just switch the
| meaning of the suffixes "" and "g", but use a new suffix. I suggest
| "f" = "follow".
I agree. In fact, I also mentioned using "f" in a previous posting.
As to implementation ... I won't be available for awhile to do much
with lynx, as I will soon be moving out of Silly Valley, to someplace
much less congested, and aside from moving my machines/etc, I'll be
needing to get hooked up with a new ISP, and all of that kind of hassle.
Hopefully, all this will be finished by mid-April ...
/kim
- Re: lynx-dev Re: syntax change, Laura Eaves, 1999/03/01
- Re: lynx-dev syntax change - hidden links digression, Klaus Weide, 1999/03/02
- lynx-dev NNN <something-or-nothing> (was: syntax change), Klaus Weide, 1999/03/02
- lynx-dev Re: NNN <something-or-nothing> (was: syntax change), Kim DeVaughn, 1999/03/02
- Re: lynx-dev Re: NNN <something-or-nothing>, Philip Webb, 1999/03/02
Re: lynx-dev Re: syntax change, Henry Nelson, 1999/03/01
Re: lynx-dev Re: syntax change, dickey, 1999/03/01