[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev syntax change - f not g
|
From: |
Klaus Weide |
|
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev syntax change - f not g |
|
Date: |
Tue, 2 Mar 1999 03:58:56 -0600 (CST) |
On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Philip Webb wrote:
>
> a good suggestion, already made by KD:
> ie for "" & "g", we would have "f" & "".
Ok, didn't meant to take the credit from KD. I wasn't sure whether
it had been proposed, and most of the recent talk in the "syntax change"
thread did not seem to consider it.
Klaus
- Re: lynx-dev Re: syntax change, Laura Eaves, 1999/03/01
- Re: lynx-dev syntax change - hidden links digression, Klaus Weide, 1999/03/02
- lynx-dev NNN <something-or-nothing> (was: syntax change), Klaus Weide, 1999/03/02
- lynx-dev Re: NNN <something-or-nothing> (was: syntax change), Kim DeVaughn, 1999/03/02
- Re: lynx-dev Re: NNN <something-or-nothing>, Philip Webb, 1999/03/02
Re: lynx-dev Re: syntax change, Henry Nelson, 1999/03/01
Re: lynx-dev Re: syntax change, dickey, 1999/03/01