Re: lynx-dev 1+g help patch - typo

[dickey]

> 
> 990304 Klaus Weide wrote:  
> > Nits... 
>  
> nuts ... (smile)? 
>  
> > On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Philip Webb wrote: 
> >> ! to <em>1g+ 1g- 1p+ 1p-</em> , but otherwise syntax is not cheched. 
> >                                                              ^^^^^^^ 
> > What is the meaning of "otherwise syntax is not checked", anyway? 
> > That doesn't seem to be useful information. 
>   
> yes, ok, one of many in Lynx documentation, if you look closely: 
> i was hurrying to catch the dev.18 deadline, predicted for today. 

I already got there (I have a meeting tonight, so I couldn't let this
drag on into tonight).  I've gotten all of the changes through last
night (except LV had one relating to bookmark files and full pathnames
which I didn't apply since it needs more discussion & work).
  
> SUPPORT     ___________//___,  Philip Webb : address@hidden 

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey