[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
lynx-dev --disable-gopher, why not --disable-finger?
From: |
John Bley |
Subject: |
lynx-dev --disable-gopher, why not --disable-finger? |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Mar 1999 21:06:09 -0500 (EST) |
Subject says it all. Well, almost. I tried to do the patch myself, but
autoconf started throwing hissyfits, and I hate to submit untested patches.
Whoever wrote the very simple DISABLE_GOPHER, could you find it in your
heart to do DISABLE_FINGER?
(Implementation note: HTGopher.c calls into the HTFinger code at one
point, be wary).
--
John Bley - address@hidden
Duke '99 - English/Computer Science
Since English is a mess, it maps well onto the problem space,
which is also a mess, which we call reality. - Larry Wall
- lynx-dev --disable-gopher, why not --disable-finger?,
John Bley <=
- Re: lynx-dev --disable-gopher, why not --disable-finger?, Webmaster Jim, 1999/03/06
- Re: lynx-dev --disable-gopher, why not --disable-finger?, John Bley, 1999/03/06
- why not --disable--news (was: lynx-dev --disable-gopher, why not --disable-finger)?, Webmaster Jim, 1999/03/06
- Re: why not --disable--news (was: lynx-dev --disable-gopher, why not --disable-finger)?, Webmaster Jim, 1999/03/07
- lynx-dev Re: why not --disable-news, John Bley, 1999/03/07
- Re: lynx-dev why not --disable-news, Kim DeVaughn, 1999/03/07
- Re: lynx-dev why not --disable-news, John Bley, 1999/03/08
- lynx-dev Dead code removal (was: Re: why not --disable-news), Kim DeVaughn, 1999/03/08
- Re: lynx-dev Dead code removal, John Bley, 1999/03/08
- Re: lynx-dev Dead code removal, Kim DeVaughn, 1999/03/08