lynx-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lynx-dev Vlad's suggestions


From: dickey
Subject: Re: lynx-dev Vlad's suggestions
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 08:32:56 -0500 (EST)

> 
> Dickey: 
> >> |    "You are already at the end of this document" and more useful  
> >> |    "You are already at the first document" seems to last too long  
> >> |    for me for INFOSECS=1, invisible for INFOSECS=0 or '-nopause' command 
> >>  
> >> |    switch. I wish I be able to set INFOSECS=0.3.  
> >>   
> >> The standard UNIX/C function sleep(3) only accepts integers for  
> >> its argument, which indicate the delay in seconds.  
> > 
> >It would be possible to use usleep if the system has it (in fact, that 
> >would be preferable - 'sleep' has a nasty effect on buffered output on 
> >most systems - pausing it - which I have not observed with usleep). 
>  
> Wouldn't setitimer(2) or select(2) be more widely available? 

they all have limitations (I've been burned with a bad implementation
of 'select()', and don't know if setitimer() is more available, since
only one program I'm working on uses it -- for a noncritical function
that I wouldn't notice if it were missing).


-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]