lynx-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?


From: Larry W. Virden
Subject: Re: lynx-dev [2.8.1] why no bold links?
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 06:37:27 -0500 (EST)

From: Tim Benham <address@hidden>
> I still think it should be possible to implement some recovery
> behavior for the situation where there's a broken gcc in the path,
> though I realize this may be a configure issue not a lynx one.

Only the first compile should  need to do this - someone asked earlier
in the thread if one needed to backtrack - but the issue isn't so much
'if a test fails, try a different compiler' but 'add a test to see if what
the name of the working compiler is'.  Defining how to determine that the
compiler is working can be as simple or complex as deemed necessary - if
it 'compiles' 'main(){}' is that sufficient?
-- 
Larry W. Virden                 <URL: mailto:address@hidden>
<URL: http://www.purl.org/NET/lvirden/> <*> O- "No one is what he seems."
Unless explicitly stated to the contrary, nothing in this posting should 
be construed as representing my employer's opinions.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]