lynx-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lynx-dev Re: resolving weird URL types


From: mattack
Subject: Re: lynx-dev Re: resolving weird URL types
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 13:01:54 -0700 (PDT)

On Thu, 13 May 1999 address@hidden wrote:

>Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 13:16:47 -0600 (MDT)
>From: address@hidden
>Reply-To: address@hidden
>To: address@hidden
>Subject: Re: lynx-dev Re: resolving weird URL types
>
>In a recent note, Philip Webb said:
>
>> Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 14:45:18 -0400 (EDT)
>>  
>> that's the sledgehammer, certainly,
>> but again, Lynx should KNOW  .uk .ca .fi .ru  are codes for countries,
>> which must always be last: it could try inserting eg  .co.uk .
>> Lynx needs to be given the list of international country codes:
>> i can provide the list, if anyone wants to do the programming.
>> 
>Forget it.  I looked at IANA's list of country codes with a mischievous
>eye.  Sixth entry: "ANGOLA AO".  Hmmm.  Maybe "American Optical"?
>Try "http://www.ao.com/";.  Rapidly connected to the home page of
>Alpha Omega Computer Systems, Inc. of Corvallis, Oregon.  Do you
>propose to filter your list of country codes to eliminate two-letter
>second-level domain qualifiers, and maintain the list?
>
>Even among the list you say "Lynx should KNOW", try (as a very easy
>guess :-) http://www.ru.edu/.  I also find cu.edu (Colorado/Cuba),
>lu.edu (Lincoln/Luxemborg), mu.edu (Marquette/Mauritius),  nu.edu
>(National/Niue) ...  Halfway through the alphabet; I'm giving up.
>
>Again, forget it.

I don't exactly understand your complaint.

If someone types "ru", then it makes sense to try "www.ru.com" (or "ru.com",
I don't know exactly what it does..  but this is similar to being able to
type "yahoo" and getting yahoo.com)..

However, if someone types "whatever.ru", then you don't want to add the 
suffixes on.

So it's not really the "ending word" that is the issue, it is the ending
word _with the dot_.  That is, if there is a dot there, then DO NOT 
use the guessing games..  If there is not a dot there, then do the guessing
games.

Doesn't this at least partially solve both problems?  It seems to.  At worst,
it does less guessing, but also it gets rid of a lot of "stupid" guessing.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]