[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
lynx-dev Re: Tables in Lynx
From: |
Michael Warner |
Subject: |
lynx-dev Re: Tables in Lynx |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jun 1999 16:33:00 -0700 |
On or about 14 Jun, 1999, Rob Partington
<address@hidden> wrote:
[...]
> Oh, definitely. That was in my plans from the start. Having
> seen what w3m does to slashdot, for example, it's now a
> fundamental requirement.
Just out of curiosity, did you find the "scroll right/left"
feature, and did it work for you? Once I figured that out,
slashdot wasn't near as bad as I first thought -- actually,
if there was some kind of indication that "there's more over
there" (or did I just miss that?), I thought it was kinda
slick. I didn't look around at any other pages, though, so
that's pretty slim evidence.
But I completely agree with making table-parsing easily
switchable. That seems pretty self-evident.
--
Michael Warner <address@hidden>
"'Just answering some E-mail,' Nat said without looking up. 'I'm in
a newsgroup. We're discussing how to use the program we're using
to discuss the program we're using.'" -- Mark O'Donnell
- lynx-dev Tables in Lynx, Rob Partington, 1999/06/14
- Re: lynx-dev Tables in Lynx, Henry Nelson, 1999/06/14
- Re: lynx-dev Tables in Lynx, Rob Partington, 1999/06/14
- Re: lynx-dev Tables in Lynx, Klaus Weide, 1999/06/15
- Re: lynx-dev Tables in Lynx, mattack, 1999/06/15
- Re: lynx-dev Tables in Lynx, Klaus Weide, 1999/06/15
- Re: lynx-dev Tables in Lynx, Eduardo Chappa L., 1999/06/15
- Re: lynx-dev Tables in Lynx, Ismael Cordeiro, 1999/06/15
- Re: lynx-dev Tables in Lynx, Ami Fischman, 1999/06/15
- Re: lynx-dev Tables in Lynx, Klaus Weide, 1999/06/15