[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev restrictions logic (was: proposal for LYK_SCRIPT and patch)
From: |
Henry Nelson |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev restrictions logic (was: proposal for LYK_SCRIPT and patch) |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Jul 1999 11:51:58 +0900 (JST) |
> There is no one "anonymous" boolean setting in Lynx. The -anonymous
> flag just translates into detailed restriction flags, and they are what
> is used in the code, and can be set individually as well. That's a
> powerful model, I don't understand why anyone would want to get rid of
Thanks. This is what I was missing.
__Henry
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: lynx-dev restrictions logic (was: proposal for LYK_SCRIPT and patch),
Henry Nelson <=