lynx-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lynx-dev [PATCH 2.8.3.dev6] fixes for psrc mode


From: Vlad Harchev
Subject: Re: lynx-dev [PATCH 2.8.3.dev6] fixes for psrc mode
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 01:15:13 +0500 (SAMST)

On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, Leonid Pauzner wrote:

> 14-Aug-99 18:17 Vlad Harchev wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Leonid Pauzner wrote:
> 
> >> 13-Aug-99 01:45 Vlad Harchev wrote:
> >>
> >> > * Now LY_SOFT_NEWLINE are used in psrc mode to denote wrapped lines (as 
> >> > in
> >> >   plain source mode).
> >>
> >> Using this patch, still have a difference
> >> between "normal" source and prettysrc output Re: line breaks.
> >>
> >> 1) LY_SOFT_NEWLINE inserted in a wrong place ( < line width)
> 
> >  Can you give an example?
> I see this on my display but printing out to local file
> concatenate lines so... it is not so easy to made hard copy for you.
> 
> >> 2) when printing source to the file we got different output (lines still
> >> truncated, at least HREF= URLs, see example below).
> >> 2b) unexpected lost of space between words in anchor title (example below).
> 
> >  Very interesting.
> 
> >  This is a diff I see on my Linux (for the same document):
> > =======================================
> > --- plain-src.html    Sat Aug 14 17:58:28 1999
> > +++ prettysrc.html    Sat Aug 14 18:04:47 1999
> ...
> > =======================================
> >  I have lss-enabled lynx-2.8.3dev6-patched being used under linux 80-cols
> > console.
> >  What lynx do you have?
> 
> I have 2.8.3dev6 without lss support (in fact, this is a DJGPP compiled
> DOS version I am playing with on my PC). I use PDCurses. 80-cols display.

 I compiled lynx without lss support (with all my patches applied). Seems I
see the same that you did. I'll inspect this.
 And my last fix for TrimHightext also had no influence on hyperlink
highlighting. I'll fix this too.

> 
> >  And don't forget that attributes are converted to the display charset, so
> > you'll probably won't get exactly the same document.
> 
> Both variants are converted to display charset (at least they should);
> and the document in question was 7bit only...

 I forgot to add "for all documents" :)

 Best regards,
  -Vlad


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]