[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things
From: |
Vlad Harchev |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Oct 1999 11:50:22 +0500 (SAMST) |
On Sat, 16 Oct 1999, Klaus Weide wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Oct 1999 address@hidden wrote:
>
>[...]
> But keep in mind that this applies to *all* text input fields, not just
> those you have any interest in, not just those you have modified. You
> page to the last screenful of some Web page, it happens to have a text
> input field near the top. Normally you'd press Left Arrow to go back
> and not even notice there was an input field. (If you're in human
> "browsing mode", not in "I want to fill in forms" mode.) Now (with the
> sticky-of-the-2nd-kind setting) the input field requires taking notice
> (why didn't Left do anything?) and then taking action (probably ^V).
WIth the patch I sent, if STICKY_INPUTS is FALSE (sticky-of-the-1st-kind)
- ie if the user has to activate text field before editing it, then pressing
key-left in non-activated input field will return to the previous document
independant of STICKY_FIELDS (well, if old behaviour is in effect wrt
sticky-of-the-2st-kind, and text field was modified, then lynx will ask
PREV_DOC_QUERY).
. I mean,
Klaus, you don't analyse all cases
fully.
> Well that's my experience. I am just speculating that you *might* change
> your mind, too.
>
> Maybe I think differently because I'm rearely in "want to fill in forms"
> mode. I expect Left Arrow to do the normal Left Arrow thing, unless
> there's a special reason.
>
> > > # STICKY_INPUTS - Input
> > > # This option controls whether all text inputs are sticky. If input is
> > > not
> > > # sticky, then it won't intercept any keyboard input until user
> > > activates it
> > > # (as usual link).
> >
> > Uggh, that's just the way w3m does it. Yuuuck.
To address@hidden: if you wish w3m like behaviour with respect text fields,
set STICKY_INPUTS to FALSE in lynx.cfg
>[...]
Best regards,
-Vlad
- Re: lynx-dev megapatch to dev.10 - and a rant, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev megapatch to dev.10 - and a rant, Klaus Weide, 1999/10/15
- Re: lynx-dev megapatch to dev.10 - and a rant, Vlad Harchev, 1999/10/15
- lynx-dev "sticky" things, Klaus Weide, 1999/10/16
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, mattack, 1999/10/16
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, Rick Lewis, 1999/10/16
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, Klaus Weide, 1999/10/16
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things,
Vlad Harchev <=
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, Klaus Weide, 1999/10/16
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, Janina Sajka, 1999/10/16
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, Klaus Weide, 1999/10/17
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, mattack, 1999/10/16
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, Klaus Weide, 1999/10/17
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, Leonid Pauzner, 1999/10/17
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, mattack, 1999/10/17
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, and a half-serious proposal, Klaus Weide, 1999/10/17
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, and a half-serious proposal, Vlad Harchev, 1999/10/18
- Re: lynx-dev "sticky" things, and a half-serious proposal, Klaus Weide, 1999/10/18