[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev JavaScript again (was no subject)
From: |
rjp |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev JavaScript again (was no subject) |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Oct 1999 20:05:49 +0100 |
In message <address@hidden>,
Klaus Weide writes:
>
> What errors need to be corrected? What kind of guarantees do you need
> about the "SGML" parser's output?
Missing <body> etc. I know it's not an error according to the rules,
but it's a bugger to try and compensate for if you're trying to build
and object tree. Things like omitted end-tags really confuse the object
tree building routines too.
> So how would lynx access its objects after you have "taken them away"?
> They're C, now, if you make them "Javascript classes and objects" they
> aren't...
You can access the methods and properties of the Javascript classes and
objects via the C API. It's not ideal; I'm not even sure it's plausible,
it just simplifies things from a Javascript perspective. If Lynx uses
the Javascript objects internally, it's a lot simpler interfacing Javascript
to them. A tautology, I know, but it would also help people trying to
develop Lynx also, I think. Learn the Javascript C API, and you can
interface with any of Lynx's internal objects/classes. It makes a bizarre
kind of sense to me.
--
rob partington % address@hidden % http://lynx.browser.org/
- [no subject], Matt Staley, 1999/10/19
- lynx-dev JavaScript again (was no subject), Leonid Pauzner, 1999/10/19
- lynx-dev Re: JavaScript again (was no subject), Matt Staley, 1999/10/19
- Re: lynx-dev JavaScript again (was no subject), Larry W. Virden, 1999/10/19
- Re: lynx-dev JavaScript again (was no subject), rjp, 1999/10/20
- Re: lynx-dev JavaScript again (was no subject), Klaus Weide, 1999/10/21
- Re: lynx-dev JavaScript again (was no subject), rjp, 1999/10/22
- Re: lynx-dev JavaScript again (was no subject), Klaus Weide, 1999/10/22
- Re: lynx-dev JavaScript again (was no subject),
rjp <=
- Re: lynx-dev JavaScript again (was no subject), David Woolley, 1999/10/24
- Re: lynx-dev JavaScript again (was no subject), rjp, 1999/10/24