[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev 'lynx -dont-wrap-pre' switch, SET_SKIP_STACK behaviour
From: |
Henry Nelson |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev 'lynx -dont-wrap-pre' switch, SET_SKIP_STACK behaviour |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Oct 1999 10:44:08 +0900 (JST) |
> I don't like the '+' prefixing convention in SOURCE very much, although
> it does the job. But something appended to the previous line (esp. a
> backslash) would be more obvious.
I rather like the behavior of the vi bundled with Solaris. It wraps at the
80 character edge, but does _not break the line_. Since the cursor does not
move with the line, this might not be suitable for Lynx, although scrolling
would seem to make it clear. I also like most which sticks a "$" at the
right edge, but then most does horizontal scroll. (Hint: if someone is
going to spend a lot of time anyway, working on right-left scrolling might
make more sense since there wouldn't be a need to break the line.) $0.02
__Henry
- lynx-dev 'lynx -dont-wrap-pre' switch, SET_SKIP_STACK behaviour, Vlad Harchev, 1999/10/28
- Re: lynx-dev 'lynx -dont-wrap-pre' switch, SET_SKIP_STACK behaviour, Klaus Weide, 1999/10/28
- Re: lynx-dev 'lynx -dont-wrap-pre' switch, SET_SKIP_STACK behaviour, Vlad Harchev, 1999/10/29
- Re: lynx-dev 'lynx -dont-wrap-pre' switch, SET_SKIP_STACK behaviour, David Combs, 1999/10/29
- Re: lynx-dev 'lynx -dont-wrap-pre' switch, SET_SKIP_STACK behaviour, Klaus Weide, 1999/10/30
- Re: lynx-dev 'lynx -dont-wrap-pre' switch, SET_SKIP_STACK behaviour, Vlad Harchev, 1999/10/31
- Re: lynx-dev 'lynx -dont-wrap-pre' switch, SET_SKIP_STACK behaviour, Klaus Weide, 1999/10/31
- Re: lynx-dev 'lynx -dont-wrap-pre' switch, SET_SKIP_STACK behaviour,
Henry Nelson <=