[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev right-left scroll (was -dont-wrap-pre)
From: |
Klaus Weide |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev right-left scroll (was -dont-wrap-pre) |
Date: |
Sun, 31 Oct 1999 11:19:49 -0600 (CST) |
On Sun, 31 Oct 1999, Vlad Harchev wrote:
> May be there is a cheap hack to achieve L-R scrolling. If 'screen' allows
> windows to be wider than actual screen, and allows to L-R scroll them (I
> don't use it since I don't have time to study it) , then IMO it's possible to
> add commandline switch like '-table-cols' that will specify how wide tables
> can be. Eg, if you use 80-col terminal, then running lynx with commandline
> 'lynx -cols=80 -table-cols=160' will allow rendered tables to take no more
> than 2 actual screens wide, while making other content to fit in 80 chars.
> Seems this is a nice idea (if screen satisfies conditions specified).
>
> Klaus, what do you think?
A "solution" that relies on screen-specific hacks is no solution.
Klaus
- Re: lynx-dev 'lynx -dont-wrap-pre' switch, SET_SKIP_STACK behaviour, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev 'lynx -dont-wrap-pre' switch, SET_SKIP_STACK behaviour, Klaus Weide, 1999/10/28
- Re: lynx-dev 'lynx -dont-wrap-pre' switch, SET_SKIP_STACK behaviour, Vlad Harchev, 1999/10/29
- Re: lynx-dev 'lynx -dont-wrap-pre' switch, SET_SKIP_STACK behaviour, David Combs, 1999/10/29
- Re: lynx-dev 'lynx -dont-wrap-pre' switch, SET_SKIP_STACK behaviour, Klaus Weide, 1999/10/30
- Re: lynx-dev 'lynx -dont-wrap-pre' switch, SET_SKIP_STACK behaviour, Vlad Harchev, 1999/10/31
- Re: lynx-dev 'lynx -dont-wrap-pre' switch, SET_SKIP_STACK behaviour, Klaus Weide, 1999/10/31
Re: lynx-dev 'lynx -dont-wrap-pre' switch, SET_SKIP_STACK behaviour, Henry Nelson, 1999/10/28