[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:
From: |
Larry W. Virden |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Nov 1999 08:24:48 -0500 (EST) |
From: Klaus Weide <address@hidden>
> Can someone remind me why putting everything on one command line
> (which doesn't work for all platforms anyway) is supposed to be better
> than editing the file userdefs.h?
I don't know the original reason. However, I find it much easier to write
a shell command which invokes configure with all the flags than continually
having to re-edit userdefs.h to set the values I want .
--
Larry W. Virden <URL: mailto:address@hidden>
<URL: http://www.purl.org/NET/lvirden/> <*> O-
Unless explicitly stated to the contrary, nothing in this posting should
be construed as representing my employer's opinions.
-><-
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, T.E.Dickey, 1999/11/21
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, Henry Nelson, 1999/11/22
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, Henry Nelson, 1999/11/22
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, T.E.Dickey, 1999/11/22
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:,
Larry W. Virden <=
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, T.E.Dickey, 1999/11/22
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, T.E.Dickey, 1999/11/22
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, Henry Nelson, 1999/11/22
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, T.E.Dickey, 1999/11/23
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, Henry Nelson, 1999/11/23
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, Henry Nelson, 1999/11/23
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, T.E.Dickey, 1999/11/23