[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG
From: |
Atsuhito Kohda |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG |
Date: |
Wed, 24 May 2000 13:36:27 +0900 |
From: Henry Nelson <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 12:02:41 +0900 (JST)
> the extra parsing of lynx.cfg and coding for lynx. Why do it?
Because I think it gives us more flexibility than the present
Lynx if I understand correctly the following;
From: Klaus Weide <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 15:06:57 -0500 (CDT)
> 1) Default is left to FALSE, to preserve previous behavior.
> I.e. lynx.cfg options are honored, regardless of what LANG etc. say.
> Packagers and distributors can easily change that, if they
> are building for an environment where that's more appropriate.
I think it is not an enough reason that extra parsing of
lynx.cfg is needed to deny the proposal.
Regards, 2000.5.24
--
Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <address@hidden>
Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG, Henry Nelson, 2000/05/23
Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG, Henry Nelson, 2000/05/23
Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG, Henry Nelson, 2000/05/24
Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG, Henry Nelson, 2000/05/24