[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Is Lynx still practical? (was Re: lynx should respect LANG)
From: |
pAb-032871 |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Is Lynx still practical? (was Re: lynx should respect LANG) |
Date: |
Fri, 26 May 2000 00:36:47 -0700 |
Just curious about the one item here:
In "lynx-dev Is Lynx still practical? (was Re: lynx should respect LANG)"
[25/May/2000 Thu 23:10:16]
Michael Warner wrote:
> I'm interested in/seek out. Actually, PDF files are a bigger
> nuisance for me than javascripted pages. I tried filtering them
> through ps2ascii (I think?) but the result was, um, aesthetically
> lacking.
>
> So I probably fire up The Other Browser twice a week for PDF, and
> maybe once or twice a month, apiece, for javascript and pictures.
> Easily a 20:1 lynx-to-NS ratio. But that's just me.
Why not tell Lynx to d)ownload PDFs so you can read them offline,
or even change your .mime.types file to show;
application/x-pdf pdf
and force downloading.
Of course, this would only work with a self-standing PDF reader,
not if you only have a browser plug-in for this. . .
Patrick
<mailto:address@hidden>
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG, pAb-032871, 2000/05/24
- lynx-dev Is Lynx still practical? (was Re: lynx should respect LANG), Michael Warner, 2000/05/26
- Re: lynx-dev Is Lynx still practical?, Donald Rober, 2000/05/26
- Re: lynx-dev Is Lynx still practical?, David Woolley, 2000/05/27
- Re: lynx-dev Is Lynx still practical?, Duncan Simpson, 2000/05/27
- Re: lynx-dev Is Lynx still practical?, Thomas Dickey, 2000/05/27
lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG, Christian Weisgerber, 2000/05/27
Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG, Henry Nelson, 2000/05/24