[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev JS onclick
From: |
Patrick |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev JS onclick |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 20:56:00 -0700 |
In "Re: lynx-dev JS onclick"
[31/Jul/2000 Mon 18:19:49]
Natasha Live wrote:
> I guess we can only hope that the advent of the digital services (in the
> UK anyway), will lower the browsing specs required.
>
> The internet browsers included in Sky/Cable/OnDigital digital services are
> not up to the task of displaying flash and similar "high level" html. In fact
[...]
> sounds from the web sites.". Whilst this doesn't affect Lynx as such, i can't
> think of anyother browser system that has similar specs to lynx as the one
> above
> does. If this is the standard of TV browsers to come then we can expect the
> specifications of the sites to drop to the level "the masses" will be using.
> And i know now better way to represent the masses then tv :)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Wow; never thought I'd be glad to hear *THAT*, but thanks!
Patrick
<mailto:address@hidden>
(Don't mind the "Patrick" bit. That's just a
trick to sort automated junk-mailers from people.
My name is pAb-032871.)
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick (was still learning), Henry Nelson, 2000/07/30
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, Philip Webb, 2000/07/30
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, David Woolley, 2000/07/30
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, pAb-032871, 2000/07/30
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, Philip Webb, 2000/07/31
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, A. R. Vener, 2000/07/31
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, Patrick Boylan, 2000/07/31
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, Natasha Live, 2000/07/31
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, mattack, 2000/07/31
- Re: lynx-dev JS onclick,
Patrick <=
Re: lynx-dev JS onclick, A. R. Vener, 2000/07/30