Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8

[pg]

In a recent note, Thomas E. Dickey said:

> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 09:16:22 -0400 (EDT)
> 
> > Hastily composed; poorly tested; integrate only if needed.
> 
I meant that part.  Probably won't even compile with ncurses.
I'll rework.  Does ncurses imply resizeterm(), or should I
test separately for resizeterm?

It might have been the putenv()s that interfere with ncurses.
I'll also try #ifdef around them.

> well, it's the beginning of a new cycle, so I'll find time to test some.
> (it's the ones at the end, to close out a patch that tend to be a
> problem).
>  
I know I submitted my patch late, after you had announced close out.
I pretty much expected it to go to dev.9.  I guess I got a free
alpha test.  :-(

-- gil
-- 
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL

; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden