[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev -anonymous restrictions not set correctly.
|
From: |
Thomas E. Dickey |
|
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev -anonymous restrictions not set correctly. |
|
Date: |
Sun, 18 Feb 2001 13:56:55 -0500 (EST) |
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Rob Cameron wrote:
> The command
> lynx -anonymous '-restrictions=?'
> under 2.8.4dev17 and dev18 shows that many restrictions have not
> been correctly set.
>
> The new "restrictions" table in LYUtils.c does not seem to be
> set up properly for the -anonymous restrictions.
>
> The TRUE settings for the "can" field should generally be changed to FALSE
> or to the value of an appropriate CAN_ANONYMOUS... variable.
um (thanks - you seem to be saying that I got confused by the
double-negative built into the naming scheme). will check.
> It would also seem that every CAN_ANONYMOUS.. variable in userdefs.h
> should be inspected here (or elsewhere) in order that the
> configurations specified in userdefs.h take effect. I can't
> figure out how that happens.
>
> ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
>
--
T.E.Dickey <address@hidden>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden