[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Q: lynx shopping?
From: |
David Woolley |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Q: lynx shopping? |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Mar 2002 07:03:13 +0000 (GMT) |
> I believe that this is probably a case where they are intentionally
> trying to exclude lynx, since they have no assurance of the way the
I doubt they care about Lynx. They are probably trying to include
only specific browsers for the reasons that you quote.
> SSL was compiled. I suspect that their terms of service may specify
I believe Lynx has at least two specific problems with SSL:
- it doesn't check the authenticity of the site it is talking to;
it only uses SSL for encryption;
- on platforms that don't generate truly random numbers, it generates
session keys with poor randomness.
> usage of certain browsers, but I don't really know.
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- lynx-dev Q: lynx shopping?, Juergen Goeritz, 2002/03/11
- Re: lynx-dev Q: lynx shopping?, Matt Ackeret, 2002/03/11
- Re: lynx-dev Q: lynx shopping?, Eduardo PĂ©rez, 2002/03/11
- Re: lynx-dev Q: lynx shopping?, Matt Ackeret, 2002/03/11
- Re: lynx-dev Q: lynx shopping?, Doug Kaufman, 2002/03/11
- Re: lynx-dev Q: lynx shopping?, Matt Ackeret, 2002/03/11
- Re: lynx-dev Q: lynx shopping?, Doug Kaufman, 2002/03/11
- Re: lynx-dev Q: lynx shopping?, Al Gilman, 2002/03/11
- Re: lynx-dev Q: lynx shopping?, David Woolley, 2002/03/12
- Re: lynx-dev Q: lynx shopping?,
David Woolley <=
- Re: lynx-dev Q: lynx shopping?, David Woolley, 2002/03/12
Re: lynx-dev Q: lynx shopping?, Henry Nelson, 2002/03/12
Re: lynx-dev Q: lynx shopping?, Philip Webb, 2002/03/12
Re: lynx-dev Q: lynx shopping?, Philip Webb, 2002/03/12