[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Problem with parameters sent in Lynx
From: |
Peter Rasmussen |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Problem with parameters sent in Lynx |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Dec 2002 23:52:17 +0100 |
On Sun Dec 29 23:24:40 2002 Ian Collier <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 10:46:04PM +0100, Peter Rasmussen wrote:
>> The Netscape 4.* series was always crap in my opinion.
>
>Yes I know it's crap but it's the only browser I've got apart from Lynx...
>
>> However, as it seems not to be maintained anymore it is dead
>
>I'm not sure why you think "dead" is the opposite of "maintained":
>not everyone has the latest and greatest version of everything. [In
>fact, virus writers rely on the fact that most people still have the
>original, unpatched, Outlook Express even though Microsoft released
>security patches for it a long time ago.]
>
Would you mind telling me why you consider Netscape 4.* your only browser
apart from Lynx?
Even Netscape 6 or Mozilla 1.0 wouldn't be the "latest and greatest".
I don't know why you bring viruses and Outlook Express into the picture?
Thank you,
Peter
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- Re: lynx-dev Problem with parameters sent in Lynx, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev Problem with parameters sent in Lynx, Peter Rasmussen, 2002/12/29
- Re: lynx-dev Problem with parameters sent in Lynx, Peter Rasmussen, 2002/12/29
- Re: lynx-dev Problem with parameters sent in Lynx, Peter Rasmussen, 2002/12/29
- Re: lynx-dev Problem with parameters sent in Lynx,
Peter Rasmussen <=
- Re: lynx-dev Problem with parameters sent in Lynx, Peter Rasmussen, 2002/12/29
- Re: lynx-dev Problem with parameters sent in Lynx, Peter Rasmussen, 2002/12/29
- Re: lynx-dev Problem with parameters sent in Lynx, Henry Nelson, 2002/12/29