Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.14h.patch.gz

[Leonid Pauzner]

8-Apr-2003 08:13 Thomas Dickey wrote:

>> Reading your patch (especially in LYMainLoop.c area),
>> I am courious about the possibility of
>>        (doc->post_data != NULL) *but* (isBEmpty(doc->post_data) == TRUE)
>>
>> currently in lynx.
>> IMHO, the invariant "post_data is NULL, or not NULL with len >0"
>> could easily be achieved somethere in HText_SibmitForm - the only place
>> where post_data is really changed.

> yes - that's a possible problem with the change
> (a form that has no data to post).

Is there a case? (empty post data really sent with POST method)???

> I guess we need a flag such as "have_post_data" to cover this situation.

Better, use `post_data' as a pointer to some struct (more members).




; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden