[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Agreement, opinions about the move ? (Was Re: mailing-list
From: |
Thomas Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Agreement, opinions about the move ? (Was Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd))) |
Date: |
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 07:23:49 -0500 (EST) |
On Sat, 7 Feb 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, SP-BEI wrote:
>
> > I'll go with whatever the Lynx community wants to do. If the
> > decision is to move the list elsewhere, I'll offer what help
> > that I can in keeping the address@hidden alive for as long
> > as possible. Of course the list is just part of the support
> > issue here. Maintaining the list and source archives might
> > also be a goal. I was waiting for someone to step up for
> > that after the non-Gnu project page was created.
>
> So, do we have an agreement ? And maybe you Bob can be the
> third administrator / moderator ?
>
> I can't do anything without you.
>
> What I proposed:
That's fine with me. How do we move forward?
> Yes, we could just add the 140+ automatically, but we don't
> know how many are still "valid".
We'll be able to tell once it's moved by looking at bounces.
> Or we can. Opinions ?
>
> 5- Contact the lynx-dev-contrib subscribers and ask if they
> want to be added in a list of addresses that can only post.
sounds fine.
> 6- If someone tries to subscribe to the old lynx-dev and
> lynx-dev-contrib, send them a message about the move.
>
> The same could be made for messages from non subscribers. But
> then you'd probably send hundreds of e-mails back to spammers.
I'm assuming that it'll be filtered like the ncurses list (so
there's the choice of simply discarding spam).
> 7- Remove the spam from the FLORA.org archives. I already did
> it for 2000-January 2004 (thanks to Pine), and really don't
> think there was any before it. Well, there was one in December
> 1999, but that's probably all. A spam (probably from a
> subscriber) in thousands of messages isn't that bad. 90% or
> more was.
I'm told that the "real" archives aren't in mbox form, but as
a database.
> 8- Once we're done we can ask FLORA.org to redirect everything
> under http://www.flora.org/lynx-dev/ to the main page of the
> new archives.
--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), (continued)
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Henry Nelson, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Thomas Dickey, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Thomas Dickey, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), SP-BEI, 2004/02/05
- lynx-dev Agreement, opinions about the move ? (Was Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd))), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/06
- Re: lynx-dev Agreement, opinions about the move ? (Was Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd))),
Thomas Dickey <=
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Thomas Dickey, 2004/02/05
- lynx-dev Re: mailing-list problem, Thorsten Glaser, 2004/02/05
- Re: lynx-dev Re: mailing-list problem, Thomas Dickey, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), David Woolley, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Henry Nelson, 2004/02/17
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/17
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Thomas Dickey, 2004/02/17
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/22
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Thomas Dickey, 2004/02/22
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/22