lynx-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Lynx-dev] RE: FW: iDEFENSE Security Advisory [IDEF1089] Multiple Ve


From: Greg MacManus
Subject: RE: [Lynx-dev] RE: FW: iDEFENSE Security Advisory [IDEF1089] Multiple Vendor Lynx Command Injection Vulnerability
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 20:47:29 -0400

Hi,

That looks like it will do it.

The original vulnerability discoverer wishes to be credited as 'vade79',
so he should probably be credited instead of me.

-- greg
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Dickey [mailto:address@hidden 
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 8:35 PM
To: Greg MacManus
Cc: vendor-disclosure; address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] RE: FW: iDEFENSE Security Advisory [IDEF1089]
Multiple Vendor Lynx Command Injection Vulnerability

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Thomas Dickey wrote:

> On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Greg MacManus wrote:
>> I'm not sure what an appropriate fix would be, but potentially a
warning
>> dialog to the user they are about to execute a local program might be
>> appropriate. Another change I could think of would be to default to
>> allow nothing to be executed, instead of default to allow all. If the
>> user wants to execute something, they must add it.
>
> That's probably suitable for novice mode (the default), or
intermediate. For 
> advanced mode lynx shows the url in the status line, so a message
would be 
> redundant.

I put a patch against dev.14 which does this.  The src/LYCgi.c change is
all that's needed.  See

        ftp://invisible-island.net/temp/lynx2.8.6dev.14b.patch.gz

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]