Re: [Lynx-dev] "lynx -child" implies "-restrictions=disk_save"

[PBM .]

That patch is useless

from mainloop:

#endif /* DIRED_SUPPORT */
   } else if (child_lynx == TRUE) {
       return (1);             /* exit on left arrow in main screen */

As you can see only this line need change for "child_relaxed"

On 6/16/07, Andrew Belov <address@hidden> wrote:
> I'm trying to wire Lynx with the Snownews RSS reader. Both fit together
> nicely except that "-child", while enabling seamless return from Lynx to
> the RSS article list, bars file-saving at the same time.
>
> I'm not aware why were the restrictions introduced in the first place,
> so I hacked a "-child_relaxed" option (see the attached patch) as a
> makeshift. The patch also takes out seemingly redundant checks that
> involve both child_lynx and no_disk_save.
>
> Note there's one additional location in LYPrint.c that may need
> attention WRT child restrictions:
>
> if (child_lynx == FALSE && no_mail == FALSE && local_host_only == FALSE)
>
> It seems logical as long as file-saving is disallowed, but if we choose
> to do away with implied restrictions for "-child", then the check for
> child_lynx==FALSE should be lifted.