Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: "lynx -child" implies "-restrictions=disk_save"

[Thomas Dickey]

On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 09:10:43PM +0400, Andrew Belov wrote:
> On Jun 17, 2007 at 04:36:48, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> 
> >> if (child_lynx == FALSE && no_mail == FALSE && local_host_only
> >> == FALSE)
> >>
> >> It seems logical as long as file-saving is disallowed, but if we choose
> >> to do away with implied restrictions for "-child", then the check for
> >> child_lynx==FALSE should be lifted.
> >
> > or perhaps make "-child" also set no_mail
> 
> OK, so if the restrictions are traditional, there is some sense in that.
> The attached patch sets both no_disk_save and no_mail explicitly for
> "-child" and cleans up the code so that child_lynx is only checked for
> in handle_prev_DOC().

thanks (will be working on lynx sooon)

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net