Re: [Lynx-dev] TLS-"transport layer security" & LYNX

[Travis Siegel]

I thought the whole reason httpd 1.1 was produced was specifically for 
this reason.  Why do they need multiple methods of producing the same 
result, especially when one breaks existing standards?


On Sat, 28 Jul 2018, Mouse wrote:

> > SNI basically transmits the actual vhost you wish to visit, in URL
> > terms the part between https:// and the first slash after that, [...]
> > [...]
> > Then, the people [...] thought it would be good to create TLSv1.3
> > [...] and decided to add SNI to that standard; not only that, but
> > they *require* it to be used now.
>
> So, TLS 1.3 is not usable for securing anything except the Web?  (That
> is, if you aren't "visit"ing a "vhost"?)
>
> /~\ The ASCII                             Mouse
> \ / Ribbon Campaign
> X  Against HTML         address@hidden
> / \ Email!           7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lynx-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev