Re: [Lynx-dev] "invalid cookie path", Re: redirection loop

[Jude DaShiell]

I was told the only machines google cookies will work on and the only
machines google is interested in are windows machines.  We do have power
users running lynx on windows, but I suspect for those of us using Mac's
and Linux those are just best disabled.

On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, Bela Lubkin wrote:

> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 03:37:07
> From: Bela Lubkin <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] "invalid cookie path", Re: redirection loop
>
> Thomas Dickey wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 01:59:39AM -0700, Bela Lubkin wrote:
> > > RFC 6265 obsoleted RFC 2965 in 2011; it says:
> >
> > sure - that's
> >
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820485
> >
> > If you have time to work on this, I'll review/etc a patch.
> > Otherwise, I'll eventually get around to it.
>
> Debbug 820485 is actually about other differences between Lynx behavior
> and RFC 6265 (i.e.: whether cookies are indexed by host port or not --
> 6265 says not).  It would potentially be reasonable to *act* on the bug
> report as if it broadly said 'Lynx is not RFC 6265 compatible', and fix
> everything that could be found.
>
> I don't intend to work on any aspect of it.
>
> >Bela<
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lynx-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
>

--