Re: If make check fails

[Gary V. Vaughan]

On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 09:34:24AM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
> >>>>> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> Gary> The call to mutt at the end is a bit of a wart, but I know of no
> Gary> better way to add mime attachments from the command line
> Gary> (patches in the body of a mail seem to get mangled).
> 
> Please, don't send them attached.  This is what we ask our
> contributors because they don't apply the patches themselves, and we
> need to preserve the exact contents, but otherwise I much prefer
> having the patch in the mail body.

Fair enough.  I'll add another option to include the patch rather than
attach it.  But I'll leave the default as it is incase the script
escapes into user land somehow ;-)

> BTW, there is something which makes my life slightly harder with your
> messages: the signature is above the patch, so the patch is removed
> when I `reply'.

That's just because of the attachment, and will be fixed by the time I
post another...

Cheers,
        Gary.
-- 
  ())_. Gary V. Vaughan     gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org)
  ( '/  Research Scientist  http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk       ,_())____
  / )=  GNU Hacker          http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool  \'      `&
`(_~)_  Tech' Author        http://sources.redhat.com/autobook   =`---d__/