m4-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 29-fyi-verbose-fatal.patch


From: Gary V. Vaughan
Subject: Re: 29-fyi-verbose-fatal.patch
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 20:23:06 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.21i

On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 09:51:35AM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 07:57:06PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > 
> > a matter of fact, I think the m4_symbol_lookup design is screwy, I
> > plan to rewrite it as 5 functions at some point -- one for each piece
> > of functionality the current function swallows.  I would have done it
> > when I rewrote the symbol table, but I wasn't sure how to disentagle
> > the M4_SYMBOL_IGNORE instances, and though it best to work the bugs
> > out of what has been changed so far before another source quake ;-)
> 
> OK, I'm on it, don't start!

Great! Thanks. :-)

> > Unfortunately, it is also incompatible with at least Solaris' 2 m4
> > implementations too =(O|  I agree that it makes for more robust code
> > though... perhaps we could enable it from the command line or and/or
> > argument to debugmode.  OTOH, I guess that as long as we turn it off
> > with --traditional and/or some runtime mechanism, it might be wise to
> > leave it enabled by default?
> 
> I'm a great believer in -W, --warning, $WARNINGS.
> 
> > That's odd.  I would have expected each of them to end up in the same
> > code in symtyab.h, and already exhibit similar behaviour.  But you're
> > right, whatever we decide to do with undefine should be applied in
> > equal measure to the others.
> 
> I'm working on this issue too.  This is because it does help me fixing
> autoupdate, which is much more challenging than I expected :(

Wow!  I'll be able to do some more writing then ;-)

> > >   Avoid using `default' in switch, as it hides useful compiler
> > >   warnings when a case is forgotten.
> > 
> > That is a nice idiom that I hadn't actually given though to before.
> > Cool, thanks.  DOes gcc warn in this case without additional -W
> > options btw?
> 
> `-Wswitch'
>      Warn whenever a `switch' statement has an index of enumeral type
>      and lacks a `case' for one or more of the named codes of that
>      enumeration.  (The presence of a `default' label prevents this
>      warning.)  `case' labels outside the enumeration range also
>      provoke warnings when this option is used.

Okay.  I'll add it to the list of switches when configuring with
--enable-debug.

Cheers,
        Gary.
-- 
  ())_. Gary V. Vaughan     gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org)
  ( '/  Research Scientist  http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk       ,_())____
  / )=  GNU Hacker          http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool  \'      `&
`(_~)_  Tech' Author        http://sources.redhat.com/autobook   =`---d__/



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]