Re: dumpdef a pushdef'd stack

[Gary V. Vaughan]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Eric,

On 27 Sep 2006, at 14:20, Eric Blake wrote:
> [[...]] now that --arglength can affect dumpdef output as well as  
> trace
> output, we should be able to tweak it on the fly.  I'm thinking a  
> macro
> named debuglen is the best fit here (fitting in with the naming of  
> other
> debug* builtins), but I could also be persuaded to name the macro
> arglength to match the command-line option.  Or maybe name it  
> debuglen,
> deprecate --arglength (as that name isn't quite descriptive of what is
> really being length-limited), and introduce --debuglen as a synonym  
> to -l.
>  Thoughts?

I think the latter is more in keeping with my notional 2.0 theme of
clean and complete integration between command line options and run
time control of the same.

Cheers,
        Gary
- --
Gary V. Vaughan      ())_.  address@hidden
Research Scientist   ( '/   http://blog.azazil.net
GNU Hacker           / )=   http://www.gnu.org/software/{libtool,m4}
Technical Author   `(_~)_   http://sources.redhat.com/autobook




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFJL2gFRMICSmD1gYRApr8AKC7+fo4qSYqqXKFE0s16BO8y1YJsACeNStz
iiNzUHKC2SZV1bOwMYGMAUs=
=QCOu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----