Re: branch-1_4 builtin vs. defn

[Gary V. Vaughan]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Eric,

On 13 Oct 2006, at 07:58, Eric Blake wrote:
> I found it annoying that builtin(`define', `foo', defn(`dnl'))  
> didn't work
> the same way as define(`foo', defn(`dnl')).

Another nice catch :-)  Where do you find the time to winkle out all
these corner cases?!?

> I will be porting this to head as well.

Our commit policy is to make simultaneous commits of patches to all
branches where they make sense... mostly to avoid losing track of
what changes remain to be ported in one direction or another.

Let me know when you think all pending patch ports between the
branches are up to date so we can start sticking to this rule again.

Cheers,
        Gary
- --
Gary V. Vaughan      ())_.  address@hidden
Research Scientist   ( '/   http://blog.azazil.net
GNU Hacker           / )=   http://www.gnu.org/software/{libtool,m4}
Technical Author   `(_~)_   http://sources.redhat.com/autobook




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFNTbxFRMICSmD1gYRAsYLAJ4mllQh1V7tHq4VgK6bnrUayY5huwCfaAFb
3XNPqEDwKpC6l09jQ4sB+tc=
=Hoim
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----