[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GMG-Devel] redmine -> trac: status; please read
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: [GMG-Devel] redmine -> trac: status; please read |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:34:51 +0100 |
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 7:12 PM, will kahn-greene <address@hidden> wrote:
> Oo--sorry about that. I didn't intend my reply to be a "rtfm" reply. I
> was just pointing out that I had written answers to that in the wiki
> page about 30 minutes ago and was wondering if that was sufficient to
> answer your question.
No offence taken! I didn't search the wiki 'cause I thought this would
be the kind of information nobody would bother putting in there, and I
was impressed that you actually did :-)
I think this does answer my question. Deploying Redmine is indeed
cumbersome because of the whole RoR thingy; I don't like Trac's
interfaces at all but it is indeed simpler. (Then there's FusionForge
but it lacks documentation; I've also seen that Savane is being
rewritten in Python/Django, but I'm doubtful as to wether it's usable
yet.)
Thanks again!
Cheers,
Valentin.
- Re: [GMG-Devel] redmine -> trac: status; please read, (continued)
- Re: [GMG-Devel] redmine -> trac: status; please read, Christopher Allan Webber, 2012/01/24
- Re: [GMG-Devel] redmine -> trac: status; please read, will kahn-greene, 2012/01/24
- Re: [GMG-Devel] redmine -> trac: status; please read, Valentin Villenave, 2012/01/24
- Re: [GMG-Devel] redmine -> trac: status; please read, will kahn-greene, 2012/01/24
- Re: [GMG-Devel] redmine -> trac: status; please read, Valentin Villenave, 2012/01/24
- Re: [GMG-Devel] redmine -> trac: status; please read, will kahn-greene, 2012/01/24
- Re: [GMG-Devel] redmine -> trac: status; please read,
Valentin Villenave <=
- Re: [GMG-Devel] redmine -> trac: status; please read, Christopher Allan Webber, 2012/01/24