mediagoblin-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GMG-Devel] Pull requests on Gitorious


From: Jim Campbell
Subject: Re: [GMG-Devel] Pull requests on Gitorious
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 11:35:19 -0500

Hi All,

I've reviewed the following documentation merge requests:

https://gitorious.org/mediagoblin/mediagoblin/merge_requests/31
https://gitorious.org/mediagoblin/mediagoblin/merge_requests/34
https://gitorious.org/mediagoblin/mediagoblin/merge_requests/38
https://gitorious.org/mediagoblin/mediagoblin/merge_requests/43
https://gitorious.org/mediagoblin/mediagoblin/merge_requests/55

I've added comments to the bottom of each one. Please see my comments, and then either close the merge, apply the merge, ask an additional question, or something else of your choosing.  : )

That leaves the merge request that I proposed:

https://gitorious.org/mediagoblin/mediagoblin/merge_requests/59

Please review it for any technical details. I tried to make clear things up - make it easier for someone to follow-along and deploy mediagoblin. However, I think some of the style may be a bit dry (especially in the earlier portions). If the technical details are ok, I can rewrite the descriptive text a bit more informally. Let me know what you think.

Thanks,

Jim



On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Christopher Allan Webber <address@hidden> wrote:
Stellar!  Closed those out.  We're now down to only 13 left.

Rj Ewing writes:

> Here's some more:
>
> http://gitorious.org/mediagoblin/mediagoblin/merge_requests/17
> http://bugs.foocorp.net/issues/298
>
> http://gitorious.org/mediagoblin/mediagoblin/merge_requests/19
> http://bugs.foocorp.net/issues/519
>
> http://gitorious.org/mediagoblin/mediagoblin/merge_requests/23
> http://bugs.foocorp.net/issues/444#note-7
>
> http://gitorious.org/mediagoblin/mediagoblin/merge_requests/24
> http://bugs.foocorp.net/issues/614
>
> http://gitorious.org/mediagoblin/mediagoblin/merge_requests/25
> http://bugs.foocorp.net/issues/608
>
> http://gitorious.org/mediagoblin/mediagoblin/merge_requests/26
> http://bugs.foocorp.net/issues/601
>
> http://gitorious.org/mediagoblin/mediagoblin/merge_requests/27
> http://bugs.foocorp.net/issues/469
>
> http://gitorious.org/mediagoblin/mediagoblin/merge_requests/30
> http://bugs.foocorp.net/issues/653
>
> http://gitorious.org/mediagoblin/mediagoblin/merge_requests/33
> http://bugs.foocorp.net/issues/544
>
> http://gitorious.org/mediagoblin/mediagoblin/merge_requests/37
> http://issues.mediagoblin.org/ticket/255
>
> http://gitorious.org/mediagoblin/mediagoblin/merge_requests/44
> Don't have a link to the ticket, but the changes are in the current code
>
> That's all for now, but if Jim goes reviews the doc related merge requests,
> there should only be a couple left.
>
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Christopher Allan Webber <
> address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the heads up; closed!  Help like this in cleaning up the list
>> is appreciated! :)
>>
>> Rj Ewing writes:
>>
>> > I was looking through some of the merge requests, and it looks like a lot
>> > of them, especially the older ones, are already merged.
>> >
>> > Ex.
>> > http://gitorious.org/mediagoblin/mediagoblin/merge_requests/23
>> > http://bugs.foocorp.net/issues/444#note-7
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Christopher Allan Webber <
>> > address@hidden> wrote:
>> >
>> >> That would work great.
>> >>
>> >> Jim Campbell writes:
>> >>
>> >> > I can review some of the documentation-related merge requests. Can
>> get to
>> >> > them this weekend.
>> >> >
>> >> > It looks like some of them may be going over some of the same sets of
>> >> > files. I can try to merge them together, fix any conflicts, and then
>> >> > re-submit upstream for review . . . would that work? I don't really
>> see a
>> >> > pretty way of handling things otherwise.
>> >> >
>> >> > Jim
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Christopher Allan Webber <
>> >> > address@hidden> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Heya all,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So you're right in observing that merge requests in gitorious get
>> mostly
>> >> >> ignored.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I created an issue about this not too long ago:
>> >> >>   http://issues.mediagoblin.org/ticket/693
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Basically, merge requests aren't within our normal workflow of
>> feature
>> >> >> adding, which is described on our wiki:
>> >> >>   http://wiki.mediagoblin.org/Git_workflow
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This means I'm often failing to pay attention to merge requests.  The
>> >> >> ticket I posted above has the goal of removing merge requests and
>> >> >> migrating the old ones.  Nonetheless, I've put both of your merge
>> >> >> requests onto my "review queue" so I'll try to get to them soon.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I could use help with that above ticket, though.  Triaging all those
>> old
>> >> >> merge requests is going to be... a lot of work. :)  If anyone thinks
>> >> >> they can help either by assisting with review or moving them over to
>> the
>> >> >> issue tracker, I'd appreciate it.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  - Chris
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Benjamin Lebsanft writes:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > #54 would be nice too, although no need to use 100 for the jpeg
>> >> >> > compression settings.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Bye
>> >> >> > Ben
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Am 14.05.2013 13:48, schrieb Sam Tuke:
>> >> >> >> Hi all,
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I submitted a pull request for a very simple documentation-related
>> >> >> >> commit a week ago[1]. I'm just wondering if anyone is monitoring
>> pull
>> >> >> >> requests to the repo? Seems like there are quite a few waiting
>> pull
>> >> >> >> requests from others with no comments from the core team[2].
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Best,
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Sam.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> 1.
>> https://gitorious.org/mediagoblin/mediagoblin/merge_requests/58
>> >> >> >> 2. https://gitorious.org/mediagoblin/mediagoblin/merge_requests
>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> >> devel mailing list
>> >> >> >> address@hidden
>> >> >> >> http://lists.mediagoblin.org/listinfo/devel
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> >> > devel mailing list
>> >> >> > address@hidden
>> >> >> > http://lists.mediagoblin.org/listinfo/devel
>> >> >>
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> devel mailing list
>> >> >> address@hidden
>> >> >> http://lists.mediagoblin.org/listinfo/devel
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> devel mailing list
>> >> address@hidden
>> >> http://lists.mediagoblin.org/listinfo/devel
>> >>
>>
>>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]