[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BSD testing
From: |
Jan-Henrik Haukeland |
Subject: |
Re: BSD testing |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Sep 2003 17:47:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion, linux) |
Or you can use the device check to monitor your cdrom station :) see:
http://www.tildeslash.com/monit/beta/presentation/img11.html
Martin <address@hidden> writes:
> The syntax for device stuff is simple, the simplest portable form:
>
> check device with path /
> if space usage > 90% then alert
> if inode usage > 90% then alert
> alert address@hidden
>
> It is more safe to use block special device in the path instead of mountpoint.
>
> You can use uid, gid and permission tests too (i don't know BSD - the bellow
> uid, gid and permissions are used on debian), for example:
>
> check device with path /dev/ad1s4
> if failed uid root then alert
> if failed gid disk then alert
> if failed permission 660 then alert
> if space usage > 90% then alert
> if inode usage > 90% then alert
> alert address@hidden
>
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
> protocol="application/pgp-signature";
> boundary="=-+WFTldleB6cbp/IJn6RI"
>
>
> --=-+WFTldleB6cbp/IJn6RI
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>
> Actually, what would really help would be if someone could send me a
> real world snippet of monitrc to test the device stuff - that's been my
> hangup so far is that I haven't had the time to understand the syntax
> and make a working monitrc with the new stuff.
>
> On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 16:09, Jan-Henrik Haukeland wrote:
>> Rory Toma <address@hidden> writes:
>>=20
>> > We should wait on rewriting this till the next release. I believe that
>> > much of the code can be made common by using sysconf and other portable
>> > calls. I hope to be able to combine much of the sysdep stuff into one
>> > file. (In between my day job, of course which has gotten annoyingly bus=
> y
>> > 8-))
>>=20
>> Okay, but I think the patch is a good one so we should try hard not to
>> forget it for the next 4.1 release. BTW, how are things at your end
>> Rory? Have you had time to test more on your various *BSDs platforms?
>> Do you feel confident in releasing monit now for FreeBSD and OpenBSD?
> --=20
> Rory Toma address@hidden
> VP of Run Level 9 http://www.trs80.net
> Digeo Digital http://www.digeo.com
>
> --=-+WFTldleB6cbp/IJn6RI--
> _______________________________________________
> monit-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-dev
> _______________________________________________
> monit-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-dev
--
Jan-Henrik Haukeland
- Re: BSD testing, Martin, 2003/09/09
- Re: BSD testing,
Jan-Henrik Haukeland <=